High Ballistic
Coefficients Mean More Hits at Long Range
It seems that the latest rage these days is to find
as light a .22 bullet as possible and then stoke it up to fly as fast as
possible. The new 40-grain Nosler ballistic bullet has a huge following. PD
shooters especially love this little bullet, since it is easily launched at
hyper-velocities, even in the modest .223 Remington. Flyweight bullets also
seem to be popular in 6mm bore. To be sure, a prairie dog hit at moderate range
disappears most spectacularly when hit with a lot of velocity. But shooters who
think these bullets give them increased range over heavy bullets are sadly
mistaken. One need only look to target shooters to see the folly in selecting
lightweight bullets.
Long-range target shooters very
carefully choose their rifles, optics, loads, and bullets. Like a lot of
varmint hunters, they know what actions to choose, what scopes to use, and how
to work up a load. When it comes to bullet selection, however, target shooters
leave most varmint hunters in the dust. Generally, target shooters choose a
fairly heavy bullet for the caliber they shoot; often, the bullet is the
heaviest for the caliber. For example, target shooters will often select
bullets 190 grains and heavier for a .30 caliber rifle – you will never see them
selecting a 150 grain load or even a faster 130 grain load. Compare that
philosophy to the current light-bullet trend in .22 centerfire rifles; 40-grain
bullets at hyper-velocities are the norm. Even military competitive shooters
who shoot M-16s use heavy bullets. The reason is simple: heavy bullets drift
less in the wind. There is more to the story than just the wind, but let’s
cover the wind drift story first.
Launching a 40 grain Nosler BT
at 4000 fps is no great feat in a .220 Swift; neither is it difficult to get a
75 grain Hornady A-Max up to 3200 fps. (But you will need a fast-twist barrel
to stabilize the bullet – see the sidebar on Shilen barrels for more details.)
At first glance, most shooters would guess that the lighter pill would shoot
flatter but perhaps give up a bit in the wind drift contest. Well…would you
believe that at 500 yards the trajectories are almost identical? More
importantly, the heavier bullet’s rate of drop at 500 yards is ten
percent less than the lighter bullet. Wind drift is even more telling…at said
500 yards, the 40 grain bullet drifts 32 inches in the standard gunwriter’s wind
(10 mph crosswind). The 75-grain A-Max drifts a little over half as much
– only 18 inches! Sportsfans, that is a huge difference. After all, even if
the trajectory was not as flat with the heavy bullet, rangefinders can pinpoint
the range and target scopes can move the reticle, but it is mighty tough to
correctly guess the wind.
Trajectory
Standard Conditions
40 Nos BT
75 Horn AMax
Difference
MV
4000
3200
200
3.1
3.9
0.8
300
0
0
0
400
-8.3
-9.2
-0.9
500
-23.8
-24.7
-0.9
600
-49.6
-47.5
2.1
700
-90
-79.1
10.9
Table 1 – Trajectory comparison of a 40 gr Nosler BT launched at 4000 fps versus
a 75 gr Hornady Amax with a muzzle velocity of 3200. Trajectories use a 300
yard zero in standard conditions.
Wind Drift
Standard Conditions
40 NosBT
75 Horn AMax
Difference
MV
4000
3200
200
4.1
2.6
1.5
300
9.9
6.0
3.9
400
18.8
11
7.8
500
31.7
17.8
13.9
600
49.7
26.7
23.0
700
74
37.8
36.2
Table 2 – Wind drift of the
same loads. Even though the 75 grain bullet starts out 800 fps slower, it
drifts incredibly less than the 40 grain bullet.
Trajectory
29 degrees Fahrenheit
40 NosBT
75 Horn AMax
Difference
MV
4000
3200
200
3
3.8
-0.8
300
-0.3
-0.2
-0.1
400
-9.1
-9.7
0.6
500
-25.9
-25.7
-0.2
600
-54.2
-49.6
-4.6
700
-99
-82.8
-16.2
Table 3 – Trajectory of both
the 40 gr Nosler BT at 4000 fps and the Hornady 75 gr AMax at 3200 fps, zeroed
at 300 yards in standard conditions, but then shot in a temperature 30 degrees
cooler. While not as large an advantage as wind drift, the Hornady bullet, due
to its higher ballistic coefficient, experiences less of a trajectory change
when weather conditions differ from those used to zero.
To illustrate just how
important the difference can be, suppose we are going to try and connect on a
prairie dog at 340 yards. The wind is blowing left to right at 12 mph, but we
estimate it as 10 mph. In a 10 mph wind, the 40 grain bullet drifts 13 inches,
or 1.3 inches per mph of wind. However, because we misestimated the wind (it
was really blowing at 12 mph), the actual drift is closer to 15.6 inches. Our
error is 3 inches, so even if we are able to hold perfectly for the 13 inch
estimated wind drift, our bullet sails almost 3 inches from the pasture poodle,
which continues to munch grass.
On the other hand, the 75 grain
Hornady V-Max at 3200 fps will only drift 7.75 inches in a 10 mph wind, or .78
inches per mph of wind. A mistake of 2 mph results in an error of only 1.5
inches, clearly less. And don’t forget, the actual bullet drift of 8.2 inches
is a lot easier to estimate than 15.6 inches. As you can see, wind drift
presents far less of a problem for the 75 grain V-Max. The reason? You
probably already know: a high ballistic coefficient.
It is often written that
gravity is the great enemy of bullet flight; if we had less of it, bullets would
shoot flatter. That concept is flawed, for it is not gravity that hurts bullet
flight, but air resistance. Air resistance slows down a bullet’s time of
flight. Think about it this way: suppose you had two identically chambered
rifles. You are shooting both at sea level, but one bullet is shot just below
the surface of the water. In other words, one bullet flies through air while
the other flies through water. The effect of gravity is the same for each
bullet. Any guesses as to which one travels farther? Of course it is the
bullet travelling through air, not water. But it is not due to gravity – it is
due to the greater resistance of water slowing the bullet and causing it to
travel less distance. Another way to look at this is following riddle… “Suppose
you held a rock in one hand and in the other hand held a rifle perfectly
parallel to the earth’s surface. If you then dropped the rock the instant the
trigger broke, which would hit first?” The answer: they both hit the ground the
same time. Of course, in the time it takes the rock to fall the bullet has
traveled a great distance. The exact distance the bullet travels is a function
of muzzle velocity and ballistic coefficient.
Without going into the boring
math details, ballistic coefficient is a numerical method expressing how
efficiently a bullet slices through air. A sharp pointed nose, a high sectional
density, and a boattail base all contribute to a high ballistic coefficient. It
is easy to understand why a pointed nose is important; the boattail perhaps a
little less obvious. As a bullet flies through the air, it creates a slight
vacuum behind it. A boattail shape reduces the amount of vacuum generated.
Sectional density is the ratio of the weight of the bullet in pounds and the
diameter in inches. The importance of this is easy to appreciate; a heavy
object is slowed less than a lighter one. Therefore, all else equal, a heavy
bullet will shed velocity slower than a lighter bullet. But, for most varmint
hunting ranges, a lighter bullet does indeed shoot flatter.
But there is more to the story
than just trajectory. With the wonderful variety of rangefinders available
today, a flat trajectory is less important than it used to be. Today, we can
range to a target and then either hold over using a special reticle or crank the
target adjustment knobs. What we must still “guess” is the wind velocity or
speed. There are some handy devices that will measure wind. Fifteen years ago
I paid $50 (a lot of money for an Army lieutenant) for my first hand-held
anemometer, or wind speed gauge. It worked okay, but was bulky. My second
device was handier; it consisted of a tube with a small plastic ball. As you
held the device, the ball rose to indicate wind speed. My latest solution to
the problem is a Kestrel wind speed gauge. It is lightweight and accurate.
What it does not do is indicate wind direction, but I use a cleaning patch tied
to my rifle muzzle with a six inch section of thread to do that. But there
remains two significant problems: the wind speed can change, or it can be
different out where your intended quarry stands. Knowing how to read mirage can
help quite a bit, but judging wind velocity remains a challenge. And since wind
remains so indeterminate, it is best to use bullets with as high a ballistic
coefficient as possible.
No serious big game hunter or
long range target shooter would ever select a .30 caliber 110 grain bullet, even
if it had the terminal properties desired, for the wind drift, as well as the
trajectory, is terrible. The same goes for lightweight .22 bullets. If you are
a very serious shooter, you may know all of this. But you should also know this:
bullets with a high ballistic coefficient are less affected by changes in
temperature. Suppose we are shooting 40 grain Nosler Ballistic Tips at 4000 fps.
We have a scope with target knobs, so we shoot at various distances so that we
know how much to “click” at various ranges. We zero in 70 degrees when the
barometric pressure is 29.5 inches. We travel to our hunting area, where the
temperature is 40 degrees and the barometric pressure is 30.1 inches. At 500
yards, these new conditions will cause the bullet to strike 2.7 inches low at
500 yards, 6 inches at 600 yards, and 12.2 inches low at 700 yards! That’s
right, a mere 30 degree temperature change combined with a .6 inch change in
barometric pressure makes it tough to connect on a prairie dog at 500 yards and
virtually guarantees a miss at longer ranges (not that it is easy without these
complications).
As you can imagine, the 75-grain
Hornady V-Max turns in a markedly improved performance. At 500 yards, the
bullet strikes 1.4 inches low, 2.7 inches low at 600 yards, and at 700 yards
strikes only 4.9 inches lower in the same cooler temperature and higher
barometric pressure. In other words, the trajectory predictability of the
heavier bullet, and consequently its “hittability,” are greatly increased. The
reason is simple...bullets with higher ballistic coefficients slice through air
more efficiently, and are thus less affected by changes in atmospheric
conditions.
It is easy to forget that most
.224 bullets have very low ballistic coefficients. A 40-grain Nosler Ballistic
Tip has a ballistic coefficient of only .221. Compare that with the 110-grain
.30 caliber Speer spire point; it has a BC of .273! Or, consider this: the 180
grain Hornady roundnose, a true “round-nosed” bullet and consequently one with a
very low ballistic coefficient, has a BC of .241, even higher than the 40 grain
Nosler BT! Granted, the 40 grain Nosler is launched with a much higher velocity
than the roundnose bullet, but the velocity of a 110 grain .30 caliber bullet
approaches that of the light .224 bullet, yet no one would consider this a
combination a long range proposition.
I have no axe to grind with
those who wish to use lightweight bullets; Steve Timm, who has killed more
varmints than I ever will, loves ‘em. But spectacular kills at moderate ranges
do not translate to increased performance at longer ranges. If you don’t
believe the ballistics I quoted, go out and shoot for yourself at long range.
After all, that is what I did that led me to the discovery in the first place.
You see, using a very accurate .220 Swift firing 55 grain bullets at 3700 fps, I
found it was actually far more difficult to hit small targets at ultra long
range than when using a less accurate 7mm Remington Mag firing 150 grain bullets
at 2900 fps. To be sure, the Swift clumped the lighter pills in a tight group...problem
was, the groups moved with the wind and the thermometer. In the winter, when
the temperature fell as much as 20 degrees below zero, the bullets would impact
as much as two feet low! As you might have read in previous stories, that Swift
now sports a Shilen stainless barrel with a fast twist that shoots 75 grain
Hornady and 77 grain Sierra bullets just as accurate as the lighter ones – but
with only half the drop difference when the temperature falls.
For long range shooting, this
is just the ticket for me. A 75 grain Hornady A-Max launched at 3200 fps has a
trajectory almost identical to the 7mm STW, a cartridge that has performed quite
well for me at long range. Wind drift and trajectory are just about the same,
but recoil is far less. Best of all, this combination lets me shoot varmints
with a rifle that has exactly the same trajectory as one of my choice hunting
rifles. Wind drift and holdover lessons learned while shooting PDs make long
range hits at big game just that much easier. And that just might be biggest
advantage to shooting .224 bullets with a high ballistic coefficient.